How can infections in burn patients be prevented?
Burn patients are at higher risk for all types of infections secondary to loss of the skin barrier as well as immunosuppression experienced because of a systemic inflammatory response triggered by the injured tissue.
Key principles to preventing infections in burn patients focus around infection prevention that is common to all patients as well as certain principles specific to burn.
Importance should be placed on:
good hand hygiene
removal of unnecessary intravascular catheters or urinary catheters
prevention of healthcare associated pneumonia
environmental infection control
Barrier protection has received considerable attention as a means of preventing spread of bacteria from healthcare workers to patients and vice versa. This includes caps, masks, gowns, gloves, aprons, and shoe covers.
Early excision for burn wounds
Immersion hydrotherapy has grown out of favor as it has been linked to multiple bacterial outbreaks.
Spray hydrotherapy is believed to decrease the risk of transmitting bacteria between patients; however, there are reports in the literature of outbreaks reported with spray hydrotherapy.
Topical antimicrobials are a key to controlling colonization and prevention of burn wound infections. These include the following:
Nanocrystalline silver dressing: newest, covers gram negative and gram-positive organisms. Lowest toxicity profile.
Mafenide Acetate: covers gram negative and anaerobic organisms. Toxicity includes metabolic acidosis. Limited coverage of Staphalococcus aureus. Does not require wound dressings. Used with nystatin or other antifungals.
Nystatin: used in combination with other agents. Effective at preventing wound fungal infections.
Silver sulfadiazine: most commonly used. Broad-spectrum activity. Does not penetrate eschar. May hinder burn wound assessment secondary to pseudoeschar it creates.
Cerium: used in combination with silver sulfadiazene. Shown to improve healing time. May decrease inflammatory response.
Silver nitrate: old therapy. Rarely used secondary to limited antibacterial activity. Potential for electrolyte imbalances.
What are the conclusions of clinical trials and meta-analyses regarding infection control in burn patients?
Early versus late excision: a 2006 meta-analysis showed mortality and LOS decreased with early excision while blood loss increased leading to increased transfusions.
Topical wound care: a 2009 systematic review of nanocrystalline silver dressings found them to be superior to silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine in reducing infections. Secondary findings included decreased cost and pain. These results were not found for pediatric patients; however, they did find a shorter LOS.
Ventilator associated pneumonia: In 2009, the American Burn Association concluded that burn patients are at high risk for VAP; therefore, burn units should closely follow CDC guidelines for prevention of health-care-associated pneumonia.
Selective digestive decontamination (SDD): two randomized, placebo-controlled double blind studies examined this topic and found differing results.
The first study published in 2001 involved 23 pediatric patients and found SDD did not decrease bacterial colonization and subsequent infectious episodes.
The second study published in 2005 enrolled 107 adult patients and documented a decrease in mortality and pneumonia.
What are the consequences of ignoring infection control in burn patients?
Hydrotherapy tanks are associated with bacterial outbreaks.
Shower systems do not provide the same reservoir for bacteria as hydrotherapy tubs do, however there have been reports of bacterial outbreaks associated with them.
Multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) is the leading cause of death in burn patients who survive the first 24 hours. Sepsis is the leading risk factor for developing MOD.
Burn patients are among the groups most at risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and as such meticulous care must be taken in preventing VAP.
Burn patients with blood stream infections have a five-fold mortality increase compared with burn patients who do not have a blood stream infection.
Delayed excision of burn wounds leads to greater incidence of burn wound infection, systemic infection, and higher mortality.
What other information supports the conclusions of studies on infection control in burn patients, e.g., case-control studies and case series?
The majority of septic events occur in the first two weeks post burn.
Multiple risk factors have been indentified including: age >= 50 years, female gender, TBSA >50%, use of hydrotherapy tanks, prior infection, and the presence of inhalation injury.
Sepsis is the most likely cause of patients who experience MOD.
Burn unit patients are among the highest risk groups for blood-borne fungal infections.
Topical nystatin has been shown to decrease fungal burn wound infections, and may be able to treat systemic infections.
Early excision of burn wounds has been shown to decrease systemic Candida infections.
Several burn centers have shown the ability to control outbreaks of resistant bacteria with simple isolation techniques.
45% of burn centers surveyed in 2006 stated they used routine isolation for new patients.
Immersion hydrotherapy has grown out of favor secondary to its association with cross-contamination between patients.
Antimicrobial agents may be added to tank water (e.g. sodium hypochlorite) however there is poor tolerance by patients and staff secondary to mucosal irritation.
Summary of current controversies.
Infection control: There is no consensus on infection control practices in burn units to prevent transmission of infections among patients. Questions regarding single-bed rooms, air handling and filtration, beds, and barrier precautions have not been fully answered although there are case studies that use the described methods as a means to control outbreaks.
Burn wound culture: There are two methods of wound culture – surface swab and biopsy. Both have been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of burn wound infection, however neither can be used alone to diagnose a burn wound infection. The criteria for defining a burn wound infection do not use wound culture as a major criteria because differentiating pathologic bacteria versus colonizing bacteria is difficult. It is also important to note that studies show that multiple pathogens can be grown from multiple swabs or biopsies from the same patient.
Prophylactic antibiotics: There are no specific guidelines regarding systemic prophylactic antibiotics for burn patients. A meta-analysis looking at 17 trials concluded that systemic prophylactic antibiotics were beneficial in regards to all cause mortality but noted that the quality of the data they used was weak. However, a review noted that an argument can be made for using systemic prophylactic antibiotics for short periods of time for patients with >40% TBSA burns during which the wound is being manipulated. The controversy stems from several studies which show varying percentages of patients with hematogenous bacterial isolates following burn wound manipulation.
GI prophylaxis: Given that the gastrointestinal tract is one reservoir for bacteria that are found to frequently infect burn wounds, there has been great interest in whether or not selective digestive decontamination (SDD) has any benefit. Several studies have examined different bowel decontamination regiments with mixed results.
What is the impact of infection control in burn patients, relative to infections in other patient populations?
Multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms are increasing in numbers each year with burn units seeing the highest rates of these MDR organisms. Multiple studies have looked at Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE), MDR Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa isolates in burn units and have concluded the following:
Meticulous adherence to infection control practices is paramount for preventing transmission to new patients.
It should be noted that P. aeruginosa is highly prevalent in a burn unit compared to other areas of the hospital, but S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcus are the most common pathogens found colonizing a burn wound.
MRSA has been shown to persist in burn units for years. Enterococcus was found in 15% of patients admitted to one burn unit; however, VRE did not begin to appear in serial swabs until two weeks.
VRE acquisition is associated with Foley catheters.
MRSA acquisition is associated with younger age and prior treatment with vancomycin.
There should be burn unit protocols for antibiotic use, removal of unnecessary intravascular and bladder catheters, and definitions for infection versus colonization.
Other recommendations found in the literature include screening all patients on admission and continuing surveillance throughout a patient’s stay.
(a) This is further emphasized from a study that sought to determine risk factors for acquiring VRE or MRSA. Once the study identified risk factors, it attempted to validate these risk factors and determine the sensitivity associated with creating a screening program for these “high risk” individuals. Unfortunately, the sensitivity was poor at 59%, thus concluding that all patients should be screened.
Overview of important clinical trials, meta-analyses, case control studies, case series, and individual case reports related to infection control and burns.
Table I, Table II, Table III, and Table IV describe the research regarding infection control in burn patients.
|Author||Year||Number of Patients||Key Conclusions|
|Gracia||2001||60||Study comparing silver sulfadiazine (SSD) and SSD combined with cerium nitrate (SSD-CN). The found that while wound infection rate did not differ between groups those with SSD-CN had faster re-epithelialization and lower mortality.|
|Barret||2001||23||Study comparing selective digestive tract decontamination with polymyxin E, tobramycin, and amphotericin B versus no treatment in pediatric patients and found no effect on colonization or infectious episodes.|
|De la Cal||2005||107||Study comparing selective digestive tract decontamination with cefotaxime, polymyxin E, tobramycin, amphotericin B versus no treatment in adult patients and found decreased mortality and pneumonia.|
|Author||Year||Number of Patients||Key Conclusions|
|Avni et al||2010||1113||Systemic antibiotic administration in the first 4-14 days reduces all cause mortality. Limitations include poor methodology of studies used for meta-analysis.|
|Gravante et al||2009||285||Nanocrystalline silver dressings provide superior prevention of infections in burn patients.|
|Ong et al||2006||288||Early excision decreased mortality but no conclusion could be made regarding sepsis. Burn wound infection was not examined. There was increase blood loss in the early excision group.|
|Author||Year||Number of Patients||Key conclusions|
|Burke||1974||200||Patients who had early excision of burn wound had decreased rates of mortality, wound infection, septicemia, and respiratory failure.|
|Deutsch||1990||30||Study comparing selective digestive tract decontamination with neomycin, erythromycin and nystatin between two groups of 15 patients found no benefit in survival between the groups.|
|Desai et al||1992||2441||Burn wound prophylaxis with topical nystatin decreased the incidence of Candida wound infection and eradicated systemic candidiasis.|
|Wurtz||1995||52||Deaths due to infection in burn patients has decreased over the last several decades, however, infections are still a significant source of morbidity and mortality for burn patients. There was a high rate of pneumonia in burn patients in this study.|
|Wright et al||1998||In vitro study||Silver is effective at killing bacteria on burn wounds including those antibiotic-resistant strains. Silver-coated dressings are the most effective at killing and have a broader range than does silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine.|
|Wisplinghoff et al||1999||87||Independent risk factors for nosocomial bloodstream infections due to acinetobacter baumannii were identified to be female gender, TBSA > 50%, prior nosocomial infection with the organism at a distant site, and the use of hydrotherapy.|
|Mousa et al||1999||There was a higher incidence of fungi in the burn unit than the control areas around the hospital.|
|Bang et al||2002||147||Prophylactic antibiotics do not affect septicemia or mortality. This study also found that improved resuscitation, continuous observation, appropriate antibiotics, nutrition, and early wound coverage improved patient mortality.|
|Xiao et al||2002||157||Early excision of burn wounds within 48 hours decreases wound closure time, rates of invasive wound infection, and sepsis.|
|Hart et al||2003||46||Early burn wound excision and concurrent aggressive feeding decrease risk for sepsis and patients have lower bacterial counts in burn wounds.|
|Barret et al||2003||20||Burn wound excision significantly reduces bacterial colonization. Patients who do undergo topical treatment and delayed burn wound excision have higher burn wound colonization and rates of infection.|
|Author||Year||Number of Patients||Key Conclusions|
|Mayhall et al||1979||75||An outbreak of enterobacter cloacae that caused septicemia in 15 patients was attributed to contamination of the hydrotherapy tanks.|
|Cardany et al||1985||22||Adding NaCl to hydrotherapy tanks decreased the number of bacteria on both burn and non-burned skin however it caused increased discomfort of burned skin and when patients became agitated caused mucosal irritation of both patients and hospital personnel.|
|Schlech et al||1986||69||An outbreak of pseudomonas aeruginosa was attributed to a swimming pool in the physiotherapy unit.|
|Manson et al||1987||48||Selective digestive tract decontamination was evaluated using polymyxin andamphotericin B with co-trimaxazole, cefradin, or tobramycin sometimes added. This study found a decrease in infectious complications.|
|Sittig et al||1988||32||Increased mortality in bacteremic patients was associated with increase in burn size, presence of inhalation injury, polymicrobial bacteremia, and gram-negative bacteremia.|
|Still et al||1995||29||Invasive fungal infection, identified by fungemia, should be treated with early use of amphotericin B.|
|Matsumura et al||1996||231||MRSA was effectively controlled in a burn unit using isolation techniques for colonized patients, which included gowns, gloves, masks, caps, and hand washing.|
|Steer et al||1996||74||Correlation between surface swab and biopsy of a burn wound is poor (54%); however, surface swab has high sensitivity in detecting the most common pathogens (S. aureus – 95% and P. aeruginosa –92%). Surface swabs are also more reproducible than are biopsy cultures.|
|Steer et al||1996||47||This biopsy study found that high bacterial counts do not correlate with sepsis and suggests that high bacterial counts do not predict sepsis or graft loss. This study did not examine specimens for histology.|
|Rodgers et al||2000||70||The most common infections occurring in children are burn wound infections and catheter-associated septicemia. Risk factors for infectious complications include children with flame and inhalational injury, TBSA burned >30% and full thickness burns.|
|Mozingo et al||1997||19||This study calls into question the need for perioperative antibiotics for wound cleansing and wound excision in patients with less than 40% TBSA burns.|
|Barrett et al||1999||4||Angioinvasive fungal infections secondary to burn wound infection were successfully treated with use of high dose (6,000,000 units/g) nystatin powder.|
|Barrett et al||1999||62||Foreign patients from third world countries admitted to burn units have a low rate of infestations (bacteria, fungus or parasites). Patients at risk can be identified by laboratory studies. Hand washing is the best method for preventing spread of disease.|
|Cumming et al||2001||85||Severe MOD and severe sepsis/septic shock are both related to burn size, age, male sex, ICU length of stay, and mechanical ventilation.|
|Embil et al||2001||6||An MRSA outbreak in a burn unit was attributed to contamination of a showerhead at the surface of the bathing stretcher in the hydrotherapy room.|
|Simor et al||2002||31||Risk factors for acquisition of a multiresistant strain of Acinetobacter baumannii at a Canadian tertiary-care teaching hospital were receipt of blood products; procedure performed in the hydrotherapy room, and increased duration of mechanical ventilation.|
|Fitzwater et al||2003||175||Elevated base deficit at 24 hours and septic shock were the most important factors associated with death after burn trauma.|
|Ballard et al||2008||456||Fungal infections in burn patients are seen regularly and contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality. Despite the increasing incidence, it is still difficult in many centers to determine if the burn wound is the source of an invasive fungal infection. Burn patients typically have risk factors that are common among all critically ill patients at risk for fungal infections, namely neutropenia, systemic steroids, central venous access, TPN, hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus, and urinary catherization. This study raised important questions such as how best to define a fungal infection, when to treat, and the role of antifungal prophylaxis.|
Controversies in detail.
There is no consensus on infection control practices in burn units to prevent transmission of infections among patients. Questions regarding single-bed rooms, air handling and filtration, beds, and barrier precautions have not been fully answered although there are case studies that use the described methods as a means to control outbreaks.
Multiple studies have attributed bacterial outbreaks to several factors such as hydrotherapy.
According to a survey published in 2006, many burn units still use a form of hydrotherapy.
While there have been reports of outbreaks related to the new shower-related hydrotherapy system, there are few epidemiological studies to determine the impact this change has had.
Burn wound culture:
There are two methods of wound culture – surface swab and biopsy.
Surface swabs can provide qualitative or semi-quantitative results. Concurrent surface swabs of burn wounds correlate better, therefore, they have better reproducibility.
Burn wound biopsy can be evaluated quantitatively or histologically. Quantitative evaluation was first developed in the 1970s as a means to diagnose burn wound infections, however subsequent studies showed that the result could vary among the same patient when a sample was taken from two different locations at the same time.
Histology provides depth of invasion as well as more accurate assessment of burn depth.
Neither surface swab nor biopsy has been shown to be superior in identifying pathologic bacteria present in burn wounds.
There are no specific guidelines regarding systemic prophylactic antibiotics for burn patients.
A meta-analysis reviewing 17 trials concluded that systemic prophylactic antibiotics were beneficial in regards to all cause mortality but noted that the quality of the data used was weak. However, another review noted that an argument can be made for using systemic prophylactic antibiotics for short periods of time for patients with >40% TBSA burns during which the wound is being manipulated.
Several studies showed varying percentages of patients with hematogenous bacterial isolates following burn wound manipulation (1.6% to 20.6%). This may lead one to believe that giving perioperative antibiotics would be beneficial, however given the varying degrees of proven bacteremia the answer to this question is not clear.
Given that the gastrointestinal tract is one reservoir for bacteria that are found to frequently infect burn wounds, there has been great interest in whether or not selective digestive decontamination (SDD) has any benefit.
Several studies have examined different bowel decontamination regimens with mixed results. These are listed in Table V.
|Manson||1987||48||This study demonstrated delayed wound colonization and fewer infectious complications. The antibiotics used were inconsistent. These included polymyxin, sometimes additional antibiotics such asco-trimoxazole, cefradin, tobramycin, and amphotericin B.|
|Deutsch||1990||30||This study did not demonstrate a difference in wound colonization or survival in patients with 20%TBSA burns or greater. Treatment was 10 days of the following antibiotics: neomycin, erythromycin, and nystatin.|
|Barret||2001||23||This study did not show a difference in wound colonization or infectious episodes in severely burned (>30% TBSA, full-thickness) pediatric patients. This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial using the following antibiotics: polymixin E, tobramycin, and amphotericin B.|
|De la Cal||2005||107||This study demonstrated a significant decrease in mortality and pneumonia in burn patients with ³ 20% TBSA burned. It was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial comparing selective digestive tract decontamination with cefotaxime, polymyxin E, tobramycin, amphotericin B versus no treatment.|
What national and international guidelines are related to infection control for burn patients?
Burn patients are at high risk for developing ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), therefore the American Burn Association (ABA) has published guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VAP. These closely follow recommendations published by the CDC.
Prevention focuses on avoiding unnecessary intubation, having ventilator weaning protocols in place, oral care, suctioning, and unnecessary red blood cell transfusions.
Diagnosis should center around clinical findings and respiratory culture.
Treatment consists of early use of broad-spectrum antibiotics with appropriate de-escalation once speciation and sensitivities are known.
For the complete ABA guidelines please see the following pubmed link (PUBMED:19826271).
For the complete CDC guidelines please see the following pubmed link (PUBMED:15048056).
Burn patients will have a significant inflammatory response from the burn itself, so distinguishing a systemic response to the burn from sepsis can be difficult. The American Burn Association Consensus Conference to Define Sepsis and Infection in Burns has published criteria for defining sepsis in a burn patient:
The consensus conference has defined parameters for Severe Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), Sepsis, Septic Shock, Smoke Inhalation Injury, Pneumonia, and Burn Wound Infection among others.
Sepsis is an important distinction since it is the point at which suspicion is raised regarding infection as well as the point at which antibiotics are begun. It is defined by at least three “triggers” which include temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, thrombocytopenia, hyperglycemia, and intolerance of enteral feeding.
For the complete guidelines please see the following pubmed link (PUBMED:17925660).
The current burn wound infection classification was put forth in 1998 by Peck et al in response to change in management techniques seen in the 1980s (i.e., early excision).
The four categories include burn wound impetigo, burn wound cellulitis, burn-related surgical wound infection, and invasive infection in unexcised burn wounds. The full definitions can be found by following the pubmed link (PUBMED:9789171).
What other consensus group statements exist, and what do key leaders advise?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has published several general guidelines for the healthcare setting whose importance cannot be overstated due to the loss of the skin barrier and immunosuppression of a burn patient. Importance should be placed on good hand hygiene, removal of necessary intravascular catheters and urinary catheters, prevention of healthcare associated pneumonia, environmental infection control, and isolation.
Al-Haddad, AM, Udo, EE, Mokadas, EM, Sanyal, SC, Grubb, WB. “Persistence of a clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burns unit”. J Med Microbiol. vol. 50. 2001. pp. 558-564.
Altoparlak, U, Erol, S, Akcay, MN, Celebi, F, Kadanali, A. “The time-related changes of antimicrobial resistance patterns and predominant bacterial profiles of burn wounds and body flora of burned patients”. Burns. vol. 30. 2004. pp. 660-664.
Altoparlak, U, Koca, O, Ozkurt, Z, Akcay, MN. “Incidence and risk factors of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus colonization in burn unit patients”. Burns. 2010.
Appelgren, P, Bjornhagen, V, Bragderyd, K, Jonsson, CE, Ransjo, U. “A prospective study of infections in burn patients”. Burns. vol. 28. 2002. pp. 39-46.
Avni, T, Levcovich, A, Ad-El, DD, Leibovici, L, Paul, M. “Prophylactic antibiotics for burns patients: systematic review and meta-analysis”. BMJ. vol. 340. 2010. pp. c241
Ballard, J, Edelman, L, Saffle, J. “Positive fungal cultures in burn patients: a multicenter review”. J Burn Care Res. vol. 29. 2008. pp. 213-221.
Bang, RL, Sharma, PN, Sanyal, SC, Al, N. “Septicaemia after burn injury: a comparative study”. Burns. vol. 28. 2002. pp. 746-751.
Barret, JP, Dardano, AN, Heggers, JP, McCauley, RL. “Infestations and chronic infections in foreign pediatric patients with burns: is there a role for specific protocols?”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 20. 1999. pp. 482-486.
Barret, JP, Ramzy, PI, Heggers, JP, Villareal, C, Herndon, DN, Desai, MH. “Topical nystatin powder in severe burns: a new treatment for angioinvasive fungal infections refractory to other topical and systemic agents”. Burns. vol. 25. 1999. pp. 505-508.
Barret, JP, Jeschke, MG, Herndon, DN. “Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in severely burned pediatric patients”. Burns. vol. 27. 2001. pp. 439-445.
Barret, JP, Herndon, DN. “Modulation of inflammatory and catabolic responses in severely burned children by early burn wound excision in the first 24 hours”. Arch Surg. vol. 138. 2003. pp. 127-132.
Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. “Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America”. MMWR Recomm Rep. vol. 51. 2002. pp. 1-45.
Burke, JF, Bondoc, CC, Quinby, WC. “Primary burn excision and immediate grafting: a method shortening illness”. J Trauma. vol. 14. 1974. pp. 389-395.
Cardany, CR, Rodeheaver, GT, Horowitz, JH, Kenney, JG, Edlich, RF. “Influence of hydrotherapy and antiseptic agents on burn wound bacterial contamination”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 6. 1985. pp. 230-232.
Chai, J, Sheng, Z, Yang, H, Diao, L, Li, L. “Successful treatment of invasive burn wound infection with sepsis in patients with major burns”. Chin Med J (Engl ). vol. 113. 2000. pp. 1142-1146.
Church, D, Elsayed, S, Reid, O, Winston, B, Lindsay, R. “Burn wound infections”. Clin Microbiol Rev. vol. 19. 2006. pp. 403-434.
Cumming, J, Purdue, GF, Hunt, JL, O’Keefe, GE. “Objective estimates of the incidence and consequences of multiple organ dysfunction and sepsis after burn trauma”. J Trauma. vol. 50. 2001. pp. 510-515.
de Gracia, CG. “An open study comparing topical silver sulfadiazine and topical silver sulfadiazine-cerium nitrate in the treatment of moderate and severe burns”. Burns. vol. 27. 2001. pp. 67-74.
de La Cal, MA, Cerda, E, Garcia-Hierro, P. “Survival benefit in critically ill burned patients receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial”. Ann Surg. vol. 241. 2005. pp. 424-430.
Demling, RH, Leslie DeSanti, MD. “The rate of re-epithelialization across meshed skin grafts is increased with exposure to silver”. Burns. vol. 28. 2002. pp. 264-266.
Desai, MH, Rutan, RL, Heggers, JP, Herndon, DN. “Candida infection with and without nystatin prophylaxis. A 11-year experience with patients with burn injury”. Arch Surg. vol. 127. 1992. pp. 159-162.
Deutsch, DH, Miller, SF, Finley, RK. “The use of intestinal antibiotics to delay or prevent infections in patients with burns”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 11. 1990. pp. 436-442.
Embil, JM, McLeod, JA, Al-Barrak, AM. “An outbreak of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a burn unit: potential role of contaminated hydrotherapy equipment”. Burns. vol. 27. 2001. pp. 681-688.
Engrav, LH, Heimbach, DM, Reus, JL, Harnar, TJ, Marvin, JA. “Early excision and grafting vs. nonoperative treatment of burns of indeterminant depth: a randomized prospective study”. J Trauma. vol. 23. 1983. pp. 1001-1004.
Fitzwater, J, Purdue, GF, Hunt, JL, O’Keefe, GE. “The risk factors and time course of sepsis and organ dysfunction after burn trauma”. J Trauma. vol. 54. 2003. pp. 959-966.
Gould, CV, Umscheid, CA, Agarwal, RK, Kuntz, G, Pegues, DA. “Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009”. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. vol. 31. 2010. pp. 319-326.
Gravante, G, Caruso, R, Sorge, R, Nicoli, F, Gentile, P, Cervelli, V. “Nanocrystalline silver: a systematic review of randomized trials conducted on burned patients and an evidence-based assessment of potential advantages over older silver formulations”. Ann Plast Surg. vol. 63. 2009. pp. 201-205.
Greenhalgh, DG, Saffle, JR, Holmes, JH. “American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns”. J Burn Care Res. vol. 28. 2007. pp. 776-790.
Gruteke, P, van, BA, Schouls, LM. “Outbreak of group A streptococci in a burn center: use of pheno- and genotypic procedures for strain tracking”. J Clin Microbiol. vol. 34. 1996. pp. 114-118.
Guggenheim, M, Zbinden, R, Handschin, AE, Gohritz, A, Altintas, MA, Giovanoli, P. “Changes in bacterial isolates from burn wounds and their antibiograms: a 20-year study (1986-2005)”. Burns. vol. 35. 2009. pp. 553-560.
Hart, DW, Wolf, SE, Chinkes, DL. “Effects of early excision and aggressive enteral feeding on hypermetabolism, catabolism, and sepsis after severe burn”. J Trauma. vol. 54. 2003. pp. 755-761.
Heggers, JP, Phillips, LG, Boertman, JA. “The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn center”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 9. 1988. pp. 610-612.
Heggers, JP, Sazy, JA, Stenberg, BD. “Bactericidal and wound-healing properties of sodium hypochlorite solutions: the 1991 Lindberg Award”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 12. 1991. pp. 420-424.
Heggers, JP, McCoy, L, Reisner, B, Smith, M, Edgar, P, Ramirez, RJ. “Alternate antimicrobial therapy for vancomycin-resistant enterococci burn wound infections”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 19. 1998. pp. 399-403.
Herndon, DN, Gore, D, Cole, M. “Determinants of mortality in pediatric patients with greater than 70% full-thickness total body surface area thermal injury treated by early total excision and grafting”. J Trauma. vol. 27. 1987. pp. 208-212.
Hodle, AE, Richter, KP, Thompson, RM. “Infection control practices in U.S. burn units”. J Burn Care Res. vol. 27. 2006. pp. 142-151.
Honari, S. “Topical therapies and antimicrobials in the management of burn wounds”. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. vol. 16. 2004. pp. 1-11.
Keen, EF, Murray, CK, Robinson, BJ, Hospenthal, DR, Co, EM, Aldous, WK. “Changes in the incidences of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant organisms isolated in a military medical center”. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. vol. 31. 2010. pp. 728-732.
Levine, NS, Lindberg, RB, Mason, AD, Pruitt, BA. “The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds”. J Trauma. vol. 16. 1976. pp. 89-94.
Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. “Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee”. Am J Infect Control. vol. 27. 1999. pp. 97-132.
Manson, WL, Westerveld, AW, Klasen, HJ, Sauer, EW. “Selective intestinal decontamination of the digestive tract for infection prophylaxis in severely burned patients”. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. vol. 21. 1987. pp. 269-272.
Matsumura, H, Yoshizawa, N, Narumi, A, Harunari, N, Sugamata, A, Watanabe, K. “Effective control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit”. Burns. vol. 22. 1996. pp. 283-286.
Mayhall, CG, Lamb, VA, Gayle, WE, Haynes, BW. “Enterobacter cloacae septicemia in a burn center: epidemiology and control of an outbreak”. J Infect Dis. vol. 139. 1979. pp. 166-171.
Mayhall, CG. “The epidemiology of burn wound infections: then and now”. Clin Infect Dis. vol. 37. 2003. pp. 543-550.
McGregor, JC. “Profile of the first four years of the Regional Burn Unit based at St. John's Hospital, West Lothian (1992-1996)”. J R Coll Surg Edinb. vol. 43. 1998. pp. 45-48.
McManus, AT, McManus, WF, Mason, AD, Aitcheson, AR, Pruitt, BA. “Microbial colonization in a new intensive care burn unit. A prospective cohort study”. Arch Surg. vol. 120. 1985. pp. 217-223.
Merz, J, Schrand, C, Mertens, D, Foote, C, Porter, K, Regnold, L. “Wound care of the pediatric burn patient”. AACN Clin Issues. vol. 14. 2003. pp. 429-441.
Monafo, WW, West, MA. “Current treatment recommendations for topical burn therapy”. Drugs. vol. 40. 1990. pp. 364-373.
Mosier, MJ, Pham, TN. “American Burn Association Practice guidelines for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in burn patients”. J Burn Care Res. vol. 30. 2009. pp. 910-928.
Mousa, HA, Al-Bader, SM, Hassan, DA. “Correlation between fungi isolated from burn wounds and burn care units”. Burns. vol. 25. 1999. pp. 145-147.
Mozingo, DW, McManus, AT, Kim, SH, Pruitt, BA. “Incidence of bacteremia after burn wound manipulation in the early postburn period”. J Trauma. vol. 42. 1997. pp. 1006-1010.
Murphy, KD, Lee, JO, Herndon, DN. “Current pharmacotherapy for the treatment of severe burns”. Expert Opin Pharmacother. vol. 4. 2003. pp. 369-384.
Murray, CK, Holmes, RL, Ellis, MW. “Twenty-five year epidemiology of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates recovered at a burn center”. Burns. vol. 35. 2009. pp. 1112-1117.
O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger, EP. “Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”. MMWR Recomm Rep. vol. 51. 2002. pp. 1-29.
O’Sullivan, ST, O’Connor, TP. “Immunosuppression following thermal injury: the pathogenesis of immunodysfunction”. Br J Plast Surg. vol. 50. 1997. pp. 615-623.
Ong, YS, Samuel, M, Song, C. “Meta-analysis of early excision of burns”. Burns. vol. 32. 2006. pp. 145-150.
Peck, MD, Weber, J, McManus, A, Sheridan, R, Heimbach, D. “Surveillance of burn wound infections: a proposal for definitions”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 19. 1998. pp. 386-389.
Petersen, SR, Umphred, E, Warden, GD. “The incidence of bacteremia following burn wound excision”. J Trauma. vol. 22. 1982. pp. 274-279.
Pruitt, BA, McManus, AT, Kim, SH, Goodwin, CW. “Burn wound infections: current status”. World J Surg. vol. 22. 1998. pp. 135-145.
Rello, J, Ollendorf, DA, Oster, G. “Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database”. Chest. vol. 122. 2002. pp. 2115-2121.
Rodgers, GL, Mortensen, J, Fisher, MC, Lo, A, Cresswell, A, Long, SS. “Predictors of infectious complications after burn injuries in children”. Pediatr Infect Dis J. vol. 19. 2000. pp. 990-995.
Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. “Guideline for disinfection and sterilization of prion-contaminated medical instruments”. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. vol. 31. 2010. pp. 107-117.
Safdar, N, Marx, J, Meyer, NA, Maki, DG. “Effectiveness of preemptive barrier precautions in controlling nosocomial colonization and infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit”. Am J Infect Control. vol. 34. 2006. pp. 476-483.
Sasaki, TM, Welch, GW, Herndon, DN, Kaplan, JZ, Lindberg, RB, Pruitt, BA. “Burn wound manipulation-induced bacteremia”. J Trauma. vol. 19. 1979. pp. 46-48.
Schlech, WF, Simonsen, N, Sumarah, R, Martin, RS. “Nosocomial outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa folliculitis associated with a physiotherapy pool”. CMAJ. vol. 134. 1986. pp. 909-913.
Sehulster, L, Chinn, RY. “Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC)”. MMWR Recomm Rep. vol. 52. 2003. pp. 1-42.
Shankowsky, HA, Callioux, LS, Tredget, EE. “North American survey of hydrotherapy in modern burn care”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 15. 1994. pp. 143-146.
Sherertz, RJ, Sullivan, ML. “An outbreak of infections with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus in burn patients: contamination of patients' mattresses”. J Infect Dis. vol. 151. 1985. pp. 252-258.
Sheridan, RL, Weber, JM, Pasternak, MM, Mulligan, JM, Tompkins, RG. “A 15-year experience with varicella infections in a pediatric burn unit”. Burns. vol. 25. 1999. pp. 353-356.
Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L. “2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings”. Am J Infect Control. vol. 35. 2007. pp. S65-164.
Simor, AE, Lee, M, Vearncombe, M. “An outbreak due to multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a burn unit: risk factors for acquisition and management”. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. vol. 23. 2002. pp. 261-267.
Sittig, K, Deitch, EA. “Effect of bacteremia on mortality after thermal injury”. Arch Surg. vol. 123. 1988. pp. 1367-1370.
Steer, JA, Papini, RP, Wilson, AP, McGrouther, DA, Parkhouse, N. “Quantitative microbiology in the management of burn patients. II. Relationship between bacterial counts obtained by burn wound biopsy culture and surface alginate swab culture, with clinical outcome following burn surgery and change of dressings”. Burns. vol. 22. 1996. pp. 177-181.
Steer, JA, Papini, RP, Wilson, AP, McGrouther, DA, Parkhouse, N. “Quantitative microbiology in the management of burn patients. I. Correlation between quantitative and qualitative burn wound biopsy culture and surface alginate swab culture”. Burns. vol. 22. 1996. pp. 173-176.
Still, JM, Belcher, K, Law, EJ. “Management of candida septicaemia in a regional burn unit”. Burns. vol. 21. 1995. pp. 594-596.
Storm-Versloot, MN, Vos, CG, Ubbink, DT, Vermeulen, H. “Topical silver for preventing wound infection”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. vol. 3. 2010. pp. CD006478
Tablan, OC, Anderson, LJ, Besser, R, Bridges, C, Hajjeh, R. “Guidelines for preventing health-care–associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee”. MMWR Recomm Rep. vol. 53. 2004. pp. 1-36.
Thompson, P, Herndon, DN, Abston, S, Rutan, T. “Effect of early excision on patients with major thermal injury”. J Trauma. vol. 27. 1987. pp. 205-207.
Tompkins, RG, Remensnyder, JP, Burke, JF. “Significant reductions in mortality for children with burn injuries through the use of prompt eschar excision”. Ann Surg. vol. 208. 1988. pp. 577-585.
Tredget, EE, Shankowsky, HA, Joffe, AM. “Epidemiology of infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in burn patients: the role of hydrotherapy”. Clin Infect Dis. vol. 15. 1992. pp. 941-949.
Tredget, EE, Shankowsky, HA, Rennie, R, Burrell, RE, Logsetty, S. “Pseudomonas infections in the thermally injured patient”. Burns. vol. 30. 2004. pp. 3-26.
Wasiak, J, Cleland, H, Jeffery, R. “Early versus delayed enteral nutrition support for burn injuries”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. vol. 3. 2006. pp. CD005489
Wibbenmeyer, L, Appelgate, D, Williams, I. “Effectiveness of universal screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to a burn-trauma step-down unit”. J Burn Care Res. vol. 30. 2009. pp. 648-656.
Wibbenmeyer, L, Williams, I, Ward, M. “Risk factors for acquiring vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a burn surgery step-down unit”. J Burn Care Res. vol. 31. 2010. pp. 269-279.
Wisplinghoff, H, Perbix, W, Seifert, H. “Risk factors for nosocomial bloodstream infections due to Acinetobacter baumannii: a case-control study of adult burn patients”. Clin Infect Dis. vol. 28. 1999. pp. 59-66.
Woolfrey, BF, Fox, JM, Quall, CO. “An evaluation of burn wound quantitative microbiology. I. Quantitative eschar cultures”. Am J Clin Pathol. vol. 75. 1981. pp. 532-537.
Wright, JB, Lam, K, Burrell, RE. “Wound management in an era of increasing bacterial antibiotic resistance: a role for topical silver treatment”. Am J Infect Control. vol. 26. 1998. pp. 572-577.
Wright, JB, Lam, K, Buret, AG, Olson, ME, Burrell, RE. “Early healing events in a porcine model of contaminated wounds: effects of nanocrystalline silver on matrix metalloproteinases, cell apoptosis, and healing”. Wound Repair Regen. vol. 10. 2002. pp. 141-151.
Wurtz, R, Karajovic, M, Dacumos, E, Jovanovic, B, Hanumadass, M. “Nosocomial infections in a burn intensive care unit”. Burns. vol. 21. 1995. pp. 181-184.
Xiao-Wu, W, Herndon, DN, Spies, M, Sanford, AP, Wolf, SE. “Effects of delayed wound excision and grafting in severely burned children”. Arch Surg. vol. 137. 2002. pp. 1049-1054.
Yildirim, S, Nursal, TZ, Tarim, A. “Bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance: comparison of findings in a burn intensive care unit, other intensive care units, and the hospital services unit of a single center”. J Burn Care Rehabil. vol. 26. 2005. pp. 488-492.
Copyright © 2017, 2013 Decision Support in Medicine, LLC. All rights reserved.
No sponsor or advertiser has participated in, approved or paid for the content provided by Decision Support in Medicine LLC. The Licensed Content is the property of and copyrighted by DSM.
- How can infections in burn patients be prevented?
- What are the conclusions of clinical trials and meta-analyses regarding infection control in burn patients?
- What are the consequences of ignoring infection control in burn patients?
- What other information supports the conclusions of studies on infection control in burn patients, e.g., case-control studies and case series?
- Summary of current controversies.
- What is the impact of infection control in burn patients, relative to infections in other patient populations?
- Overview of important clinical trials, meta-analyses, case control studies, case series, and individual case reports related to infection control and burns.
- Controversies in detail.
- What national and international guidelines are related to infection control for burn patients?
- What other consensus group statements exist, and what do key leaders advise?
Want to read more?
Please login or register first to view this content.