Background
- Scoliosis is a common spinal deformity characterized by a lateral curvature of the spine 10°or greater on a posterior-anterior radiograph while standing.
- Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the onset of scoliosis of unknown cause at age 10 to18 years.
- Most common type in children, with a reported prevalence of about 2% in the general population
- More common in girls than boys
- Risk factors for curve progression include lateral spine curvature (Cobb angle) greater than 30° skeletal immaturity, and female gender
- Adolescents with spine curvature greater than 50°at skeletal maturity are likely to have continued curve progression in adulthood
Presentation Concerns
- Typically presents as chest wall or back asymmetry, or affecting shoulders or waist
- Patients may report breast asymmetry
- Severe pain not a major characteristic of scoliosis in adolescents; if severe pain present, may indicate alternative diagnosis
Medical and Family History
- History of heart disease may suggest syndromic cause of scoliosis, as in Marfan syndrome
- Ask about family history of scoliosis
Continue Reading
Physical
- Assess for:
- Lateral curvature while standing
- Left-right asymmetry of:
- Shoulders
- Waist
- Pelvis
- Scapula
- Flank
- Space between loosely hanging arm and body
- Head not centered over pelvis
- Use Adam’s forward bend test to assess curve rotation
- Inspect patient from behind while flexed forward, with head and arms relaxed
- Assess for rib prominence in thoracic spine area, and/or paraspinal muscle prominence in lumbar region
- Examine extremities
- If tall with high arm span to height ratio, consider Marfan syndrome
- Arachnodactyly/joint laxity may indicate connective tissue disorder such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Differential Diagnosis
- Other types of scoliosis
- Congenital
- Caused by spinal malformations present at birth, but may not be apparent until later in childhood
- Can be associated with cardiac and genitourinary malformations
- Neuromuscular
- Caused by disorders resulting in lack of muscular support to spinal column
- Miscellaneous/syndromic scoliosis due to other causes, including:
- Neurofibromatosis
- Connective tissue disorders
- Osteochondrodystrophies
- Metabolic conditions
- Tumors
- Congenital
- Unequal leg length
- Hemihypertrophy
Evaluation
- Suspect diagnosis in children aged 10 to 18 years with new-onset chest wall, back, pelvis, shoulder, and/or waist asymmetry
- Use Adam’s forward bend test and inclinometer to assess curve rotation
- Findings suggestive of scoliosis include:
- Rib prominence in thoracic spine area and/or paraspinal muscle prominence in lumbar region.≥ 7° of axial rotation on inclinometer
- If axial rotation < 7°but other findings suggest scoliosis, reassess in 6 to 12 months
- Findings suggestive of scoliosis include:
- In adolescents with ≥ 7° of axial rotation, obtain a posteroanterior spinal radiograph.
- Lateral curvature of the spine ≥ 10° in the coronal plane while standing confirms scoliosis.
- Lack of an identifiable cause confirms adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
- Evaluate skeletal maturity with Risser grade (lower score indicates less mature skeleton)
- Measures ossification of iliac apophysis
- United States classification (total score range 0-5)
- Grade 0 – 0% ossification
- Grade 1 – 25%
- Grade 2 – 50%
- Grade 3 – 75%
- Grade 4 – 100%
- Grade 5 – fusion of ossified epiphysis to the iliac wing
Management
- Management is based on
- Curve severity (Cobb angle)
- Minimizing curve progression and reaching skeletal maturity with spine curvature < 50° (curves < 50° are more likely to remain stable, while curves ≥ 50° are likely to worsen)
- For curves ≤ 25°
- Consider observation, with regular monitoring every 3 to 6 months
- For curves 25° to 45° in skeletally immature adolescents (Risser grade ≤ 2)
- Consider bracing
- Goal is to prevent progression to surgical threshold (bracing unlikely to improve cosmetic deformity)
- Bracing efficacy increases with increased use (should be worn ≥ 12 hours/day)
- Consider bracing
- Scoliosis-specific exercises may be considered as adjuvant treatment to other conservative treatments, but evidence for efficacy is inconsistent
- Surgical options
- For curves > 45° in skeletally immature adolescents and in skeletally mature adolescents (Risser grade ≥ 3) with curves > 50°, consider spinal fusion
- Fusion of spine via instrumentation and bone graftingIntended to stop curve progression and improve spinal balance/alignment
- Complications may include:
- Infection
- Spinal cord injury
- Decreased spinal motion
- “Flat back” syndrome (loss of lumbar lordosis)
- Superior mesenteric artery syndrome
- For curves > 45° in skeletally immature adolescents and in skeletally mature adolescents (Risser grade ≥ 3) with curves > 50°, consider spinal fusion
- For curves 30° to 65° in skeletally immature patients
- Consider spinal tether device in patients with failed/intolerant to bracing
- Device includes anchors/vertebral body screws that are placed into same side of each vertebra
- Tension applied to tether to compress one side of spine and partially correct curve
Follow-up
- Follow-up depends on growth potential and Cobb angle
- For prepubertal girls and boys 10 years and older with Cobb angle
- 10-14° – repeat assessment in 1 year
- 15-19° – repeat assessment in 3-6 months/refer to orthopedist if angle increased ≥ 5°
- 20-24° – refer to orthopedist, or repeat assessment in 3 months/refer to orthopedist if angle increased ≥ 5°
- ≥ 25° – refer to orthopedist/see patient in 1 month
- For pubertal premenarchal girls and pubertal boys aged 12-14 years with Cobb angle
- 10-14° – repeat assessment in 1 year
- 15-19° – repeat assessment in 3-6 months/refer to orthopedist if angle increased ≥ 5°
- 20-24° – repeat assessment in 3 months/refer to orthopedist if angle increased ≥ 5°
- ≥ 25° – refer to orthopedist/see patient in 1 month
- For postmenarchal girls and boys aged 14-16 years with Cobb angle
- 10-14° – repeat assessment in 1 year
- 15-29° – repeat assessment in 6 months/refer to orthopedist if angle increased ≥ 5°
- 30-45° – refer to orthopedist
- ≥ 45° – refer to orthopedist/see patient in 1 month
- For girls ≥ 2 years after menarche or boys aged 16-18 years with Cobb angle
- 10-19° – no treatment necessary
- 20-29° – repeat radiographic assessment in 5 years and refer to orthopedist if angle increased ≥ 5°
- 30-45° – refer to orthopedist
- ≥ 45° – refer to orthopedist/see patient in 1 month
- Atypical features such as clinically significant pain, left thoracic curvature, neurologic abnormalities, foot deformity, or excessive lordosis or kyphosis require earlier follow-up
Complications
- Primary complication is disfigurement of torso with shoulder or waist asymmetry, rib rotation, or trunk imbalance
- Pulmonary insufficiency syndromes
- Thoracic deformity can impede attainment of adult chest volume and restrict pulmonary development
- Thoracic scoliosis
- > 50° increases risk for shortness of breath later in life
- ≥ 70° is associated with reduced lung volume
- > 100° associated with symptomatic restrictive pulmonary disease
Prognosis
- Reoperation within 10 years reported in 3% to 10% of surgically-treated idiopathic scoliosis
- Scoliosis progression
- Factors associated with increased risk for curve progression
- Cobb angle > 25 to 30°
- Skeletal immaturity
- Female gender
- Curve progression after skeletal maturity
- Progression rare if Cobb angle ≤ 30° and patient has reached skeletal maturity (bone age 15 years in girls or 17 years in boys)
- If Cobb angle > 50° at skeletal maturity, curve usually worsens throughout adulthood
- Factors associated with increased risk for curve progression
- Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis associated with increased risk for chronic back pain in adulthood
Kendra Church MS, PA-C, is a physician assistant at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women’s Hospital, and is also a senior clinical editor for DynaMed, an evidence-based, point-of-care database.
References
- El-Hawary R, Chukwunyerenwa C. Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014;61(6):1223-1241. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.007
- Hresko MT. Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(9):834-841. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1209063
- Negrini S, De Mauroy JC, Grivas TB, et al. Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;50(1):87-92.
- Hacquebord JH, Leopold SS. In brief: the Risser classification: a classic tool for the clinician treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(8):2335-2338. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2371-y