Ortho Dx: Complications after total knee arthroplasty - Clinical Advisor

Ortho Dx: Complications after total knee arthroplasty

Slideshow

  • Anteroposterior X-ray.

    OrthoDx_091317_Image1

    Anteroposterior X-ray.

  • Lateral X-ray.

    OrthoDx_091317_Image2

    Lateral X-ray.

  • Bone scan of the lower extremities.

    OrthoDx_091317_Image3_v2

    Bone scan of the lower extremities.

An 80-year-old woman presents with 3 months of right shin pain. She had a revision total knee replacement 5 years ago for aseptic loosening and had been doing well. Her pain is made worse with weight bearing and is relieved with rest. She has tried non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and 4 weeks of touch-down weight bearing with little improvement. On examination, she has no effusion and full passive motion without pain. Anteroposterior and lateral X-rays taken in the office show no abnormalities (Figures 1 and 2). A bone scan of the lower extremities shows increased uptake of the right tibial shaft consistent with a tibial stress reaction (Figure 3). What is the most likely diagnosis?

This case has been brought to you in partnership with the Journal of Orthopedics for Physician Assistants.

The most common complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include aseptic loosening, infection, instability, and periprosthetic fracture. The most common cause of early TKA failure (within 2 years) is infection, while the most common cause of late failure is aseptic...

Submit your diagnosis to see full explanation.

The most common complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include aseptic loosening, infection, instability, and periprosthetic fracture. The most common cause of early TKA failure (within 2 years) is infection, while the most common cause of late failure is aseptic loosening. Approximately 40% of TKA failures overall result from aseptic loosening, and 27% are due to septic failure. Aseptic prosthetic loosening can be caused by a variety of factors, including implant malalignment, malpositioning, instability, and poor bone quality. This patient has a long, uncemented revision metal stem, and the implant is press fit into the tibial canal. The press fit metal component has no bony ingrowth potential at the implant-bone interface, so any excess motion of the stem can cause the surrounding bone to fatigue. Pain made worse with weight bearing is a sign that the metal implant is starting to cause fatigue, or a stress reaction, at the tibial diaphysis. This is confirmed on the patient’s bone scan.

In the work-up of aseptic loosening, X-rays are often negative early in the presentation. With normal X-rays, a bone scan is the next best study of choice. A bone scan can be positive up to 2 years after TKA, so results should be correlated with the clinical scenario. This patient has a positive bone scan 5 years from revision TKA, so the changes in the tibial stem can be ruled pathological. The patient’s bone scan shows increased uptake at the implant-bone interface of the tibial stem, suggesting aseptic loosening. Unfortunately, when stress reactions occur, as did in this patient, conservative treatment with a period of non-weight bearing is often unsuccessful, and a revision surgery is generally required.1,2

Dagan Cloutier, MPAS, PA-C, practices in a multispecialty orthopedic group in the southern New Hampshire region and is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Orthopedics for Physician Assistants (JOPA).

References

  1. Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1774-1778.
  2. Lonner JH, Lotke PA. Aseptic complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7:311-324.
Next hm-slideshow in Ortho Dx